Микросток терминилогия и съкращения
  • 0 Comments sorted by
  • Реклама:

  • Супер добре описани термините от суперфотографа Yiuri Arcurs (не мога нещо да пускам линкове - http://www.arcurs.com/)


    Agency slang:





    G: Getty images



    SV or just "snap": Snapvillage.




    IS: Istock.com



    AL: Alamy.com



    SXP: Stockxpert.com



    SS: Shutterstock.com



    CS: Crestock.com



    DT: Dreamstime.com



    FT: Fotolia.com



    BS: Bigstockphoto.com



    YAY:  YayMicro.com



    P5: www.pond5.com




     



    Microstock 



    Stock agencies selling images at a very low price. Normally around 1USD for a small resolution royalty free license.



     



    Midstock 



    A term that has been the subject of a lot of
    controversy. Prices at midstock collections such as the Fotolia
    Infinity collection, Snapvillage, Featurepics or the 123RF EVO
    collection are normally 10 USD for a small web resolution and either 50
    to 100USD for a ultra high res. Midstock operates with commissions of
    normally 50% and together with the high prices compared to microstock,
    these collections are effective ways for a small agency to compete
    efficiently against bigger agencies that have lower prices and lower
    commission such as istockphoto.com or shutterstock.com. Midstock
    normally operates with price-exclusivity (see below).



     



    Macrostock



    Macrostock or "traditional stock" describes all
    the agencies not selling their images at microstock prices, such as
    Corbis, Getty, JupiterImages, Veer, Alamy, etc. Prices in macrostock
    have dropped and you can now buy a low res web usage license at Getty
    for only 49USD. However the prices in macro are much higher than micro
    and midstock, normally between 50 - 750USD depending on size.



     



    Cannibalization



    This term in relation to stock photography covers
    the idea, that if a photographer suddenly starts selling his images at
    a much lower price point than before, he will be "cannibalizing" his
    own ability to make real money from his own higher priced images. The
    concept of cannibalizing is most often used as a criticism of
    microstock and it is often said that microstock is cannibalizing the
    whole macrostock industry by under pricing images too much.



     



    Price point



    At a given agency, the lowest price for one
    royalty free license for one image is it’s starting "price point". When
    discussing stock theory, people often say things like "this is too low
    a price point" or "we should try selling at the lower price points"
    Price points are often referred to as the lowest price at which you can
    buy an image. The price point in microstock is therefor normally 1USD,
    the price point in midstock is 10-20USD and the price point in
    macrostock is 50USD, but often higher.



     



    Picture Pooling



    First used by: Yuri Arcurs



    This phenomenon is normally used as a criticism against subscription agencies. It describes the fact that buyers that have
    a subscription will download more pictures then they use and will
    sometimes download pictures for future purposes. The result

    is pools of pictures that the designer can use instead of buying new
    pictures. Picture pooling is a real threat and it is confirmed by
    multiple users that if you opt out of subscription selling at
    Stockxpert for example you will actually earn more almost immediately,
    despite not getting any income from subscription sales. This can
    however be caused by more factors then just the result of picture
    pooling.



     



    Self-pricing



    Inventor: Featurepics, Snapvillage among others.



    Self-pricing agencies are very popular and
    basically let the photographers decide at what price point they want to
    sell their images at, low as well as high prices. Self-pricing is
    normally between 1USD - 50 USD for the highest resolution file.



     



    Non-exclusive



    Non-exclusive agencies and collections allow for
    the images in them to be sold elsewhere. Normally non-exclusive images
    don’t have a price-exclusive agreement and you can basically sell the
    same images at all price points.



     



    Exclusive images



    Exclusive images are found on one agency only and
    cannot be sold elsewhere. The most successful exclusivity program is
    the iStockphoto exclusivity program or the Getty Collections. This
    program offers a wide range of extra benefits for the exclusive
    photographer, such as higher commission, faster inspections, etc. The
    iStock exclusivity program requires not only the images, but also the
    photographers themselves to be completely exclusive in the sense that
    the photographer is not allowed to sell Royalty Free stock for any
    other agency accept Getty.



     



    Photographer exclusivity



    Photographer exclusivity occurs when a
    photographer chooses to sign a contract forbidding him to produce stock
    material for any other agency. Normally he receives special benefits
    for doing so, but it is very criticized and very dangerous because the
    income is limited to one agency only, so if that agency falls back in
    sales, the photographer will experience a drop in income, but is bound
    to stay with that agency. Some photographers report having gone from
    making as much as 30000USD per month to 3000USD per month in less then
    two months in exclussive collections.



     



    Price exclusive



    Price exclusive images are images that belong to a
    collection that are not allowed to be sold at a lower price then the
    price they have in this collection. The Fotolia Infinite collection is
    a price exclusive collection, and will not allow that you sell the
    images at other agencies at a lower price. Price exclusive images are
    non-exclusive, but just price exclusive.



     



    Duplication/plagiarism



    Plagiarism is a very controversial subject. When a
    photographer is looking for new images to produce it is very normal to
    get "inspiration" from another photographers. Sometimes however,
    photographers will go a little too far in this endeavour and duplicate
    another photographer’s pictures a little too much, being that the
    resemblance is simply too similar to the original. This causes great
    debates and forum tantrums and can cause a great deal of heat among
    photographers. Before you accuse someone of duplicating your images,
    make sure you really are the first one to have come up with the concept
    and that the other image really is similar to yours. For example, if
    the accused duplicator has also duplicated your titles and keywords
    too, this is a good indicator of intentional plagiarism. Stock
    photographers in microstock will re-invent a lot of concept that have
    already been thought of and been well executed in traditional stock.
    These new "inventors" in microstock will then claim and believe they
    are the original inventors of this concept and think that everyone is
    duplicating them. The most controversial and talked about duplication
    case is for sure the "jumping goldfish" from iStock and the most
    duplicated photographers are Andres Rodriguez, Yuri Arcurs and Lise
    Gagne from iStock.



     



    Technical quality vs aesthetic quality



    Technical quality describes a photographer’s
    ability to control and produce digital images without well known and
    defined technical mistakes such as fringing, artifacts, shaken focal
    point, flare, moire, etc. The aesthetic quality refers to all the
    aspect that makes a photograph interesting: the conceptual, emotional
    and creative elements of the image. The lowest degree of technical
    quality is often found on amateur forums such as diviantart.com or
    flickr.com, while the highest technical quality is found on
    iStockphoto. IStockphoto has far more strict technical quality
    standards than any place in macrostock, despite the much higher prices.
    The ability to produce high aesthetically pleasing images that also
    have high technical quality is what defines the difference between the
    amateur and the professional. Places like iStock, with extremely high
    technical standards, are often criticized for being too straight and
    rejecting too many images that have high aesthetically quality but not
    "perfect" technical quality.



     



    Forum slang / acronyms for photography related forums:


    LCV - Limited Commercial Value
    PM - Private Massage HDR - High Dynamic Range
    SUB - Subscription lisences.
    MR - Model Release.
    RM - Right maneges licences.
    RR - Rights-Ready
    RF - Royalty Free licences.
    OOF - Out Of Focus DOF - Depth of Field
    OD: On Demand Sale DL - Subscription Sale EL - Extended Licence Sale
    BME - Best month ever (sales) WME - Worst month ever (sales) BDE - Best day ever (sales)
    WDE - Worst day ever (sales)
    Inspectors/reviewers/bouncers/editors/curators/creative content team are all words for the same



     

    nname.org the devil himself

Добре дошъл!

Изглежда сте нов/а тук. Ако желаете да вземете участие в дискусиите, кликнете на някой от тези бутони:

Login with Facebook

Продавай снимки

Добре дошли на българските дискусии за сток фотография, видео и илюстрации